Local search study: Orange County chiropractors
How 46 practices actually show up on Google — an independent audit of every chiropractic practice we could identify in Newburgh and Middletown, New York. What's working, what's broken, and what it likely costs them.
The headline numbers
Website fundamentals
These are the basics Google checks. The percentages below are calculated only over the 28 practices whose website actually loaded — the 18 practices with no website at all are excluded, so these figures are not inflated by businesses that simply have nothing to test.
| Issue found | Share | Count |
|---|---|---|
| No structured data (schema markup) | 50% | 14 of 28 |
| Missing meta description | 46% | 13 of 28 |
| Not mobile-friendly | 21% | 6 of 28 |
| No HTTPS (browser shows "Not Secure") | 11% | 3 of 28 |
Structured data is what tells Google explicitly that you are a local business, in a particular town, offering particular services. Half of these practices give Google nothing to work with, which means Google has to infer it — and inference is where rankings get lost.
Page speed
Google treats mobile page experience as a ranking factor, and the large majority of local searches happen on a phone. Scores here come from Google's own PageSpeed Insights mobile performance test.
Measured on the 27 sites that returned a score. A slow page does two things at once: it ranks lower, and the visitors who do arrive leave before the page finishes loading.
Google Business Profile completeness
The Google Business Profile — the Maps listing — is the most important local ranking asset and the cheapest to fix. We scored completeness across whether a website is linked, a phone number is present, hours are listed, photos are uploaded, reviews exist, and a primary category is set.
| Finding | Share | Count |
|---|---|---|
| Profile not fully complete | 87% | 40 of 46 |
| Few or no photos | 85% | 39 of 46 |
| No website linked | 39% | 18 of 46 |
Median completeness across all 46 practices was 60%. Every item in that list is free to fix and takes an afternoon. This is the clearest finding in the study: the cheapest available improvements are the ones being skipped.
Reputation
Review volume and recency are among the strongest local ranking signals, and the clearest trust signal for a patient deciding between two practices.
The ratings are excellent almost everywhere — these are well-regarded practices. The gap between the median practice and the local leaders is not quality of care. It is review volume, and the fact that some practices ask for reviews systematically while most do not ask at all.
Review recency mattered as much as count. Several practices in the study had not received a new Google review in over three years, while others in the same towns were receiving them within the last month. A profile that has gone quiet reads, to a prospective patient scanning results, like a practice that has gone quiet.
Marketing maturity
Only 33% of the practices had any analytics installed on their website, detected from publicly visible tracking tags. Two thirds therefore have no way of knowing how many people visit their site, where those people came from, or whether anything they do about it works.
What we would tell a practice owner
- Fix the Google listing before the website. Photos, hours and the correct primary category are free, take an afternoon, and move the needle faster than anything else in this report.
- Open your own site on your phone. If it is slow or hard to read, that is exactly what prospective patients are experiencing.
- Ask for reviews systematically. The distance between the median practice here and the market leaders is mostly review volume, not marketing budget.
- Get on HTTPS. Browsers label sites without it "Not Secure" before a visitor reads a single word. It is usually a same-day fix and often free with modern hosting.
Methodology
Sample: 46 chiropractic practices in Newburgh and Middletown, New York, identified through the Google Places API and filtered by Google's own business category so unrelated businesses were excluded. Duplicate listings for the same practice were removed where they were detectable.
Website checks were performed by requesting each practice's public homepage and inspecting the returned HTML for HTTPS, a mobile viewport tag, page title, meta description and structured data. Speed scores come from Google's PageSpeed Insights API on mobile. Profile completeness is derived from publicly available Google Places data.
Limitations: this is a point-in-time snapshot and practices may have made changes since collection. Only public homepage data was examined, so problems on deeper pages are not reflected here. Google's category data occasionally misclassifies a business. Review recency is estimated from a sample of recent reviews rather than a complete history. No private, paid, or login-protected data was accessed, and no individual practice is identified anywhere in this report.
On correlation: practices with more complete profiles do tend to have more reviews in this data. We are not claiming one causes the other — larger, established practices can afford both — and within this sample some signals showed no relationship to review count at all.
Want this run on your own practice?
We will send you the same one-page breakdown for your business, free, whether or not we ever work together.
Get your free audit